Peer Review Policy

Journal of Sustainable Smart Technologies (JSST)

Introduction

The Journal of Sustainable Smart Technologies (JSST) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of scholarly publishing through a rigorous, fair, transparent, and objective peer review system. Peer review is essential for ensuring the quality, originality, validity, and significance of published research.

JSST follows a Double-Blind Peer Review Policy, where both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the review process.

Purpose of Peer Review

The peer review process aims to:

  • Ensure the publication of high-quality research.
  • Evaluate the originality and scientific merit of submitted manuscripts.
  • Improve the quality and clarity of research articles.
  • Maintain academic integrity and ethical publishing standards.
  • Support informed editorial decision-making.

Double-Blind Review Policy

JSST adopts a Double-Blind Peer Review model.

Under this model:

  • Authors do not know the identities of reviewers.
  • Reviewers do not know the identities of authors.
  • Editorial decisions are made solely on academic merit.

This process helps eliminate bias and promotes objective evaluation.

Reviewer Selection

Reviewers are selected based on:

  • Subject expertise.
  • Research experience.
  • Publication record.
  • Professional qualifications.
  • Absence of conflicts of interest.

Each manuscript is typically reviewed by at least two independent experts.

The Editorial Board may seek additional reviews when necessary.

Evaluation Criteria

Reviewers are requested to evaluate manuscripts based on:

Originality and Novelty

The extent to which the work contributes new knowledge, concepts, methods, or applications.

Technical and Scientific Quality

The soundness of the research design, methodology, analysis, and interpretation.

Relevance

Alignment with the aims and scope of the Journal of Sustainable Smart Technologies.

Clarity and Organization

Quality of writing, structure, presentation, and readability.

Significance and Impact

Potential contribution to sustainable technologies, innovation, and scientific advancement.

Ethical Compliance

Adherence to ethical standards, publication ethics, and responsible research practices.

Reviewer Responsibilities

Reviewers are expected to:

  • Maintain strict confidentiality.
  • Provide objective and constructive feedback.
  • Identify ethical concerns and potential misconduct.
  • Declare any conflicts of interest.
  • Complete reviews within the specified timeframe.
  • Respect intellectual property rights.

Reviewers must not use unpublished information obtained during the review process for personal or professional advantage.

Editorial Responsibilities

Editors are responsible for:

  • Ensuring an impartial review process.
  • Selecting qualified reviewers.
  • Maintaining confidentiality.
  • Managing conflicts of interest.
  • Making final publication decisions.
  • Upholding publication ethics and integrity.

Editorial decisions are based solely on scholarly merit and relevance to the journal.

Confidentiality

All submitted manuscripts and review reports are treated as confidential documents.

Information regarding submitted manuscripts is disclosed only to:

  • Authors
  • Assigned reviewers
  • Editorial staff
  • Publisher (when necessary)

Confidentiality is maintained throughout the review and publication process.

Conflict of Interest

Editors and reviewers must disclose any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may influence their evaluation of a manuscript.

Individuals with conflicts of interest shall not participate in the review or editorial decision-making process.

Editorial Decisions

Based on reviewer recommendations and editorial assessment, one of the following decisions may be issued:

Accept

The manuscript is accepted for publication.

Minor Revision

Minor modifications are required before acceptance.

Major Revision

Substantial revisions are required before reconsideration.

Reject

The manuscript does not meet the journal's standards or scope.

The Editor-in-Chief retains final authority regarding publication decisions.

Appeals and Complaints

Authors who believe that a manuscript has been unfairly rejected may submit a formal appeal to the Editor-in-Chief.

Appeals must include:

  • Detailed justification.
  • Response to reviewer comments.
  • Supporting evidence where applicable.

The Editorial Board will review appeals independently and communicate its final decision.

Ethical Oversight

The journal actively investigates concerns related to:

  • Plagiarism
  • Duplicate publication
  • Data fabrication
  • Data falsification
  • Citation manipulation
  • Authorship disputes
  • Research misconduct

Appropriate corrective actions may include rejection, correction, retraction, or notification of affiliated institutions.

Commitment to Quality and Sustainability

JSST is dedicated to publishing high-quality research that advances sustainable technologies and contributes to the achievement of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly:

  • SDG 7 – Affordable and Clean Energy
  • SDG 9 – Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure
  • SDG 11 – Sustainable Cities and Communities
  • SDG 12 – Responsible Consumption and Production
  • SDG 13 – Climate Action

The journal seeks to promote responsible innovation, technological advancement, and sustainable development through a robust and transparent peer review system.

Contact Information

Editor-in-Chief
Journal of Sustainable Smart Technologies (JSST)
Website: https://jsstjournal.com
Email: editor@jsstjournal.com